Canadian Space Astronomy Workshop (CSAW) - Report

René Doyon

 

The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) hosted the first Canadian Space Astronomy workshop on November 23 and 24 2006. More than 100 participants from academia, industry and government agencies gathered at the John H. Chapman Space Centre in St-Hubert to exchange and discuss future space astronomy missions and Canada’s involvement in those missions. The goal of the workshop was to initiate the process of defining a balanced Canadian space astronomy program for the next decade up to ~2025. What are the big questions and which missions can address them? What will come after the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)? What will be our top-priority space missions in the next Long Range Plan (LRP)?

 

The format of the workshop was designed to stimulate discussions rather than have formal presentations. The morning of the Day 1 was devoted to introductory talks. John Hutchings gave us   a very interesting perspective and lessons learned from his three-decade long experience in space astronomy. Representatives from ESA, JAXA and NASA (represented by CSA since NASA could not attend because of US Thanksgiving) presented their future plans. In the afternoon, participants were invited to join five sub-groups divided by science theme, from the Solar system to cosmology, to focus on big science questions. On Day 2, 4 breakout sessions were held in parallel with participants from all science themes, this time to discuss specific missions that could address the science objectives identified on Day 1. A summary of all breakout sessions was presented to all participants followed by a general discussion.

 

A “call for ideas” was issued prior to the workshop to give participants the opportunity to present a brief written overview of their ideas in advance (mission and/or technology development). The majority of these ideas were briefly presented and discussed in the second breakout session; many of them were supported by posters which stimulated further discussions during coffee and lunch breaks. There was no shortage of ideas, big and small! Two dozen missions were briefly presented, the majority falling in one of those eclectic categories: solar system, exoplanets, wide field imaging, UV, x-ray, far-infrared and cosmic microwave background. A more detailed description of the missions/ideas presented at the workshop will be available on the CSA web site (www.space.gc.ca/CSAW) by the end of this year.

 

One clear message that came out of the workshop was that Canadians are very keen to get involved in big missions as leader and/or major partner. The mission “package” discussed at CSAW would certainly be worth several billions of dollars; clearly, only a small fraction of those missions could be realistically funded. A first attempt was made to prioritize these missions but this exercise was somewhat premature given that we have yet to learn more about the missions that were (very briefly) presented.

 

CSA presented a brief overview of its nominal space astronomy budget over the next 10 years. Simply put, except for small missions in the $3M range and microsats in the $10M range (all to be competed for with other space disciplines), there are no funds yet identified that would allow Canada to either lead or be a major partner in a big mission on the scale of the Canadian contribution to JWST (approximately $100M over ten years). It is for the community to make the appropriate representations to our governments in order to raise these funds and the success of this lobbying exercise will rely much on having a well-developed plan i.e. a “short list”. It was clear right from the beginning that such a short list would not be the main output of the workshop but CSAW certainly unveiled several potential “front-runners” and, more comforting, names of people ready to go and lead these long haul projects.

 

What is the way forward? There is a clear path for small missions. CSA has set up a new structure of announcements of opportunities (AOs) that should be out in the next few months to enable such small missions.  In addition there will be AOs for technology development which will help prepare for future missions (both large & small).  For big missions, like for large ground-based observatories, the only realistic way to get them funded is to get a sufficiently broad community behind it, so that, as a community, we can argue convincingly that this is part and parcel of a LRP that is simply too good not to support.  Therefore, the next step for the community is to get organized and focus on fleshing out the details of these big missions. CSA can help this process in many ways, for instance by organizing other workshops like CSAW and issuing relevant AOs like the one recently issued on Discipline Working Groups. It was apparent at the workshop that many of these groups are being formed. Communications between CSA and the community will be crucial to make this process as effective as possible. To keep the obvious momentum created by CSAW, JCSA has formally requested a special poster session and a one-hour town hall discussion on large space missions at the next CASCA in Kingston including participation from CSA. Of course, potential leaders are strongly encouraged to present their mission concepts in more details as a normal contributed talk/poster at the next CASCA. People are also encouraged to express their ideas and comments to JCSA (JCSA_Members@space.gc.ca) as to how one should proceed for coordinating future activities leading to the definition of our space astronomy program.

 

As expressed by many participants, CSAW was a very successful event, in particular to make the community aware of the urgency of planning our space astronomy program in the next two decades. CSAW was only the beginning of a process; hopefully, within 2 years, we shall have new exciting space projects in the executive summary of the next LRP.

 

 

 

René Doyon

Université de Montréal  

Chair of the CSAW scientific organizing committee and member of JCSA