ALMA Update
1 Recent news
A major focus of activity in the international ALMA project over the
past few months has been the rebaselining of the project to bring it up
to date since the definition of its schedule and budget in October
2002. There is the potential that this process will significantly
impact project schedule and scope, but the project is determined to
make every effort to avoid significant impacts on ALMA's Level 1
Science Requirements. In the United States, President Bush has signed
an appropriations act that, among many other things, will fund NSF
construction efforts for ALMA this year at the expected level of US$
50M.
Adrian Russell, formerly head of the UK Astronomy Technology Centre in
Edinburgh, has taken up his position as North American ALMA Project
Manager at NRAO in Charlottesville.
Procurement of the antennas has been delayed from last year to this
year as the bilateral partners (USA and Europe) work extremely
carefully and hard to ensure the success of this critically important
element of the construction project. Towards this end, testing has
resumed at the Socorro Antenna Test Facility on the two prototype
antennas. Designed to address remaining technical issues, these tests
include 100,000 cycle (10 seconds per cycle, 24 hours per day for two
weeks) fast switching tests.
Other parts of the North American ALMA effort continue to progress
well. The first pre-production receiver cryostat was delivered from the
UK. This one metre wide cryostat is designed to hold as many as ten
receiver cartridges per antenna. Preliminary tests indicate the
cryostat has considerable spare cooling capacity over its
specification. The first Band 3 (at HIA) and Band 6 (at NRAO)
cartridges are both performing well in their initial series of tests,
and the back end and correlator work continues to make excellent
progress (the latter under budget and ahead of schedule). The other two
initial receiver bands for ALMA, Bands 7 and 9, are proceeding in
Europe, and Japan is ramping up work on the Band 4, 8, and 10
cartridges (and on its Atacama Compact Array).
Work is continuing on the Operations Plan, with the first complete draft
planned to be presented to the Board at their April 2005 meeting.
Funding for ALMA operations has already begun to ramp up at NRAO and ESO
through both new hiring and re-assignment of people to the ALMA project.
A major task here in Canada in the next year will be to identify the
specific contributions that we can make to ALMA operations.
In Chile, the interim offices of the Joint ALMA Office (JAO) in
Santiago were opened in November. Mass excavation works at the
Operations Support Facility (OSF) below Llano Chajnantor continue, as
do road works.
In the area of outreach, there will be an ALMA lunch session at CASCA in
Montréal in May as well as two posters describing the current Canadian
work in receivers and software, and also a poster providing an update
on the ALMA project as a whole.
2 ALMA Science Advisory Committee
The ALMA Science Advisory Committee met September 27-28, 2004 in
Charlottesville, Virginia. The main focus of the meeting was
on five charges from the ALMA Board.
Unfortunately the report from the meeting is not yet on the public
ALMA web page, but I hope it will appear there soon. I will
summarize the main points here.
Most of the discussion focused on the first charge, which was to
recommend science-based criteria that could be used by the project in
preparing tradeoff studies should the budgetary situation require them.
This discussion was particularly difficult because the ASAC was not given
any financial information as to what the cost savings of a particular change to
ALMA might be. The ASAC concluded that the loss or reduction of any element of
the baseline project will result in significant loss of ALMA science.
One interesting point is that imaging simulations presented at the meeting
suggest that the effect on image quality of decreasing the number of antennas
in ALMA is incremental, in a similar way that reducing the number of
antennas by one would result in a slight increase in the rms noise level
achieved in a given integration time.
We also had an extensive discussion on the second charge on how to facilitate
joint projects between
scientists from the different ALMA partners, large proposals, and legacy
projects. Based on those discussions, the ASAC felt that the best way to
handle large programs would be to have a single International Program
Review Committee (similar to the ITACs for the JCMT and Gemini) that
would rank and/or choose between large proposals. Scientific overlap between
small proposals was felt to be a less critical issue, as smaller amounts
of ALMA resources would be at stake. I recommend that anyone interested
in these issues read the report when it becomes available. However, it
is important to bear in mind that working out time allocation for ALMA
is an on-going process and our thinking on it may well evolve with time.
On the charge related to calibration, the ASAC concluded that
relaxing the absolute amplitude calibration specification from
1 to 3% below 300 GHz and from 3 to 5% above would not have a prohibiting
impact on ALMA's major science goals. However, we emphasized that repeatability
and relative accuracy should be maintained at a higher level.
On the charge related to demonstration science and community involvement,
the ASAC thought this would be best achieved by teaming
astronomers from the wider community with ALMA experts to execute
projects end-to-end, from the definition of scheduling
blocks through observations and data reduction to publication.
On the current draft science verification plan, the ASAC was concerned
about whether sufficient scientific staff would be available to
carry out the plan, as well as the short time currently allocated for science
verification.
The ASAC met again February 24-25, 2005 in Garching, Germany. We had only
two charges from the Board for this meeting. The first charge asked us
examine the status of ALMA re-baselining and to comment on the scientific
impact of any proposed changes. The second charge was a repeat of the
charge from
our previous meeting regarding facilitating joint projects etc. Since the
ASAC report is not yet finalized as I write this, I will summarize our
conclusions in my next report and at the ALMA lunch meeting at CASCA.
3 ALMA Developments in Canada
3.1 Band 3 Receiver Development
As noted above, the Band 3 Receiver Project at HIA continues apace.
Cartridge #1 is scheduled to be delivered to the NA Integration Centre
this spring. The Cartridge Test Set has been equipped to perform all
the tests required for checking the specifications. Each of these
experiments needed to be completely established before full
characterization could begin. To accomplish these tests for each LO
frequency (every 1 GHz), a tuning table needed to be generated that
would be valid over the mixer operating range of 3.75 to 4.25K. Also,
since the cartridge must be tested within the appropriate environment,
extremely careful setup is required. The HIA Test cryostat thermal
stability and temperature must be identical to the Front End one.
The Cartridge Test Set is now running in semi-automated mode and will
be upgraded to be fully automated by the end of this year.
Initial measurements of Cartridge #1 reveal that it should have no
problem meeting the specifications. The Band 3 receiver has
unprecedented performance characteristics. The single sideband noise
is an impressive 40 K. Image rejection is better than -10 dB. Gain
saturation is better than 5%.
Gain stability, on timescales 0.1 to 1 sec, is less than 4×10-7
(Allan variance). Cross-polarization is better than 20 dB. The IF
output power and signal flatness also meet specifications, i.e. 4 dB
peak to peak in any 2 GHz and 6 dB peak to peak across the whole IF
band (4-8GHz). The excellent test results
for Cartridge #1 are a testament to the entire Band 3 instrumentation
team.
Keith Yeung has returned to the Band 3 Project (welcome back!) and is playing
an instrumental role in the commercialization of the Band 3 IF amplifiers.
A 4-8 GHz cryogenic high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) amplifier
has been developed at HIA specifically for the ALMA Band 3 receivers.
This low noise amplifier (LNA) is designed to amplify the IF signal at
a cryogenic temperature of 4 Kelvin by more than 30 dB and has an ultra
low noise figure of less than 5 Kelvin. A contract was let to Nanowave
Technologies Inc. of Toronto last October to manufacture forty-three
copies of these HIA amplifiers for the eight Band 3 preproduction cartridges.
HIA is currently negotiating a technology license agreement for Nanowave
Technologies to supply all the remaining LNAs for the Band 3 production
cartridges and, possibly, for the Band 4 and 8 cartridges being developed
by the ALMA-Japan Teams.
For more information on the ALMA Band 3 Receiver Project contact Doug
Johnstone (Project Scientist - doug.johnstone@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca),
Stephane Claude (Project Engineer - stephane.claude@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca),
or Keith Yeung (Project Manager - keith.yeung@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca).
3.2 Software
The January 2003 audit of the AIPS++ package for ALMA offline data
processing concluded that support for the recording of the data processing
history was inadequate. This was marked as a high-priority defect within the
package and as a result, Raymond Rusk and Gary Li have
been heavily involved in the effort to improve this.
After Raymond and Gary completed integrating Juan R. Pardo's atmospheric
model into AIPS++, they moved on to logging important AIPS++ data processing
steps to the history section of AIPS++ data tables including:
- flagging measurements suitable for scientific use
- calibrating data against known astronomical sources
- imaging observations
While Gary worked primarily on recording the flagged data, Raymond did all
other work related to this task and also added code to make this information
retrievable in an easy-to-use format.
Shortly after completing his flagging work, Gary was assigned the important
task of fixing the slow filling problem of almatifiller, a tool used convert
to and from ALMA and AIPS++ data formats for Plateau de Bure Interferometer
(PBI) observations. He then proceeded to work on adding tolerance to the
frequency and pointing models so that frequencies within the given tolerance
will be indicated by identical spectral window IDs. This enhancement is
especially useful to the vlafiller tool.
David Fugate has been heavily involved in an effort to clean up existing ALMA
Common Software (ACS)
to conform to ALMA Software Engineering coding standards.
While most ACS code predates the standards, it is vital to adhere to the
standards for maintenance reasons. As always, a substantial portion of his
time has been used to support ALMA software engineers throughout the world
which includes investigating ALMA software problem reports. Recently David
has contributed much to the ACS 4.1 design discussions and has just been
assigned his tasks for ACS 4.1. This consists mainly of improving and adding
to ACS documentation in addition to a complete refactoring of the ACS
logging mechanism to permit its reuse within the ALMA Offline software
subsystem (i.e., AIPS++).
Chris Wilson is currently carrying out
the third test of the ALMA Pipeline software, which is a regression
test to see if needed changes identified in the November 2004 test have
been implemented adequately. The next pipeline software test will likely take
place in early summer 2005 and will again involve outside testers. Anyone
interested in participating in this test (and getting an early peak
at ALMA Pipeline processing) should contact Chris.
3.3 Other related news
The 10 micron water vapour monitor (IRMA) concluded testing on the
Submillimeter Array
in early January, 2005, with two of the
three units having demonstrated a continuous run without failure of over 4
months. The third unit was brought back to Lethbridge in late November in
order to be upgraded for deployment at Gemini South. This was done in
February where Gemini are evaluating its use as an observing scheduling
aid. In order to make more progress with data analysis, the IRMA project
will have a PhD student added to it within the next couple of months.
Chris Wilson wilson@physics.mcmaster.ca
Canadian ALMA Project Scientist
(with input from Jim Hesser, Doug Johnstone, Lewis Knee,
Robin Phillips, and Russ Taylor)
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 3.40.
On 18 Jun 2005, 12:39.