| " It
is four years since the completion of the report of the NRC-NSERC
Long Range Planning Panel on the future of Canadian astronomy (LRP).
Since that time, and with strong federal Government support, CSA and
NRC have made important commitments to begin achieving several LRP
primary goals. These include Canadian involvement in the James Webb
Space Telescope
and meeting the conditions of the NAPRA agreement enabling Canadian
partnership in ALMA.But the LRP is, at minimum, a ten-year plan while the incremental funds
are for a maximum of five years. Not all LRP recommendations are funded
and, in some cases, budgeted monies run out in March, 2005, e.g., for
studies leading to Canadian partnership in projects such as the Square
Kilometer Array and a Very Large Optical Telescope, which were strongly
recommended in the LRP. Moreover, new factors such as the availability
of CFI funds for national and international projects and the establishment
of the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy
(ACURA) are changing the landscape for Canadian Astronomy. NSERC has
recognized the increasing involvement of Canadian astronomy in large
international facilities and has suggested that our community consider an envelope funding scheme such as that used by the subatomic physics community. It is clearly time to review the LRP.As a mid-course review, this will not be as extensive or elaborate a process as the original LRP, but it requires the same integrity, commitment to openness and involvement of the Canadian astronomers. The report will build on the original LRP and will be the tool by which the community will seek funding for the next phases of the LRP. The purpose of the review then is to assess the progress achieved in the first five years of the plan and to make recommendations on what steps need to be taken to ensure that the goals of the plan are achieved. The LRP Mid-Course Review Panel, in consultation with the Canadian astronomical community, CSA, NRC, NSERC, ACURA and relevant industries is requested to review progress toward the LRP goals, identify any serious implementation gaps that have emerged, and recommend strategies for the next five years. The Panel should consider areas in which little progress has been made, such as establishment of instrument labs in universities, and how to sustain the operations of the international facilities in which Canada is, or will be, involved. The scope of the review should incorporate all initiatives outlined in the LRP, but should not include a major revision or expansion of the plan that is inconsistent with the original goals. In conducting the review, the Panel must openly involve the community through procedures which make possible input from all members of CASCA. The Panel should make a direct report available to CASCA members no later than May 31, 2004 and there will be an opportunity for discussion of that report during the CASCA Annual General Meeting (June 13-16). The final version of the report should be completed by Sept. 30, 2004. Board of Directors Canadian Astronomical Society DATE: February 26, 2004" |
Our first challenge as a committee is to ensure that the committee's operational procedures are as open as possible while accommodating the more limited scope and time frame of its mandate compared with the that of the original LRP. After some deliberation, we have decided on the following operating procedure:
If anyone has concerns, advice, suggestions either now or at any time, please contact me at seaquist@astro.utoronto.ca.
Ernie Seaquist
Committee Chair